Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Interest of ADR

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 18, 1980No. 61177, 56658 and 57596Published

1DissentSeiler, Judge

Although the principal opinion opens by announcing its scope is limited to consideration of the single issue of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel and adopts as the standard for evaluation of appellate counsel’s actions the same standard as used for gauging trial counsel’s conduct, the principal opinion then proceeds to deal with both claims made — i. e., the claim that the juvenile court improperly relinquished jurisdiction and the claim that Rone’s in-custody confession was taken without his parents having been notified as soon as possible that he was in custody as required by section…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. J. T. P v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API