State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division v. Jackson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Chief Justice.
The question presented is whether, under the Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Act, collateral estoppel may be premised on an uncontested denial of a claim by the Worker’s Compensation Division (Division). Relying on Tenorio v. State, ex rel. Workers’ Compensation Div., 931 P.2d 234, 237 (Wyo.1997), we conclude that an uncontested denial of a claim by the Division will not be given collateral estoppel effect in subsequent proceedings for outstanding claims. We affirm the hearing examiner’s order awarding benefits.
ISSUES
We adopt the injured worker’s statement of the issue:
Did…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tenorio v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Tenorio v. STATE, EX REL.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- Osenbaugh v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim Of: Lea v. Porter v. State of Wyoming, Ex Rel., Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Lincoln Trust Custodian FBO Wendell William Mercer No. 61067486 v. Parker (In Re Parker)District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re OsenbaughWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- STATE EX REL. WKRS'SAFETY DIV. v. JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1999