Pitts v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Arthur Pitts appeals from his jury conviction of theft, a class D felony, 1 and from his sentence as an habitual offender. 2 Because the trial court has granted Pitts a new sentencing hearing on the habitual offender count, we face now only the jurisdictional aspect of that issue. We affirm the remaining part of the trial court’s judgment which is final.
FACTS
Appellant Pitts drove away from Brid-well Auto Sales in Bedford, Indiana, in a 1969 four-door bronze Cadillac with a black vinyl roof, ostensibly for the purpose of discussing its purchase with his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pulliam v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Norris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Wise v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Proctor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Wininger v. Purdue UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Rutledge v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.