Legal Opinion

Heins v. Synkonis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1975No. Docket 19017PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBashara, P. J.

This suit was instituted by plaintiff for the recovery of damages for malpractice against Dr. Synkonis. Plaintiff further contended that defendant Riverside Osteopathic Hospital (hereinafter referred to as Riverside) was liable under the theory of agency by estoppel. A jury verdict awarded plaintiff $50,000 against defendants jointly and severally. It is from this judgment that defendants appeal.

Plaintiff suffered a minor fall, injuring her right shoulder. Plaintiff received conservative treatment from a physician, but when there was no improvement in her condition, she sought the advice of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Howard v. ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Daniel v. McNamaraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Marchlewicz v. StantonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Haidy v. SzandzikMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Strach v. St. John Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Ravenis v. Detroit General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. VanStelle v. MacAskillMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Clapham v. YangaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Murphy v. SobelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API