Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Caithness Rica Ltd. Partnership v. Malachowski

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 27, 1993No. 92-276-M.PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FAY, Chief Justice.

The petitioners, Caithness RICA Limited Partnership, Newbay Corporation, and Rhode Island Cogeneration Associates, L.P. (collectively Newbay), have filed a petition for certiorari pursuant to G.L.1956 (1988 Reenactment) § 42-98-12 and G.L.1956 (1990 Reenactment) § 39-5-2 to review a Report and Order of the Energy Facility Siting Board (EFSB). On May 15, 1992, the EFSB ruled that it has jurisdiction over Newbay’s proposed coal-fired cogeneration facility (facility) and ordered Newbay to submit a licensing application to the EFSB. Newbay raises seven specifications of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbane Co. v. PoulasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  2. City of East Providence v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  3. State v. LaPlumeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. Newbay Corp. v. MalachowskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re BarnacleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  2. State v. BenoitSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. Newbay Corp. v. SissonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  4. Greater Providence Deposit Corp. v. BarnacleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  5. State v. BenoitSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API