Legal Opinion
Holloran v. Duncan
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided March 18, 2015No. Nos. 13-1050, 13-1080, 13-1194, 13-1165, 13-1192, 13-1187, 13-1193, 13-1167, 13-1195, 13-1166, 13-1168PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*782ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS, GRANTING MOTION OF COUNTY DEFENDANTS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases, Daniel Coulborn Holloran I (“Hollo-ran Sr.”), Daniel Coulborn Holloran II (“Holloran Jr.”), Amanda Hallman, Travis Ricke, Evan Brown, Alexis Pinnell, Daniel Fisk,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Derrick Bunkley v. City of Detroit, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. CarlossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Epperson v. City of HumboldtDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Wright v. Fentress Cnty.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Adeeko v. Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.