Legal Opinion
Sherley v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 27, 2011No. Civ. 1:09-cv-1575 (RCL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
Two scientists brought this lawsuit, asking this Court to find that the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Human Stem Cell Research (“Guidelines”) are invalid as a matter of law. The Court’s initial dismissal of plaintiffs’ case for lack of standing was reversed on appeal, and plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction was reinstated. The Court promptly granted plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, but was again reversed on appeal, and the Court must now determine the merits of the case. Before the Court are…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE FEDERAL EXCISE TAX REFUND LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Shell Oil Company v. the United States 06-141c & 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Minuteman Health, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Four Jays Music Company v. Amazon.com IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Minuteman Health, Inc v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.