Legal Opinion

Swartz v. English

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1896No. 58PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Rice district court; A. M. Lasley, judge pro tbm. Action by John M. English against Henry Swartz and John Osthoff to recover on a redelivery bond. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring the case to 'this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dennison, J.:

This action was commenced in the district court of Rice county, Kansas, by John M. English against Henry Swartz and John Osthoff, to recover upon a redelivery bond executed and delivered by them in an action in replevin before a justice of the peace in Sterling township, in said county, in which said English was plaintiff and G. M. Dilley, otherwise known as Jim Dilley, and Joseph Hughes were defendants. The bond was taken by the constable and the property in controversy was delivered to the defendants in the replevin action. Judgment was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schnitzler v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foust v. BibbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Lowe v. Southern Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lowman v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Floreth v. TotschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API