Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph D. Solomon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 1986No. 85-1112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, Circuit Judge.

Joseph D. Solomon was convicted of counterfeiting currency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471 and with conspiracy to counterfeit under 18 U.S.C. § 371. We affirm his conviction.

Events. The evidence introduced at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution as seen by a reasonable juror, see United States v. Hodges, 770 F.2d 1475, 1478 (9th Cir.1985), establishes the following course of events: Solomon initiated a plan to counterfeit United States currency. He recruited confederates. He provided $2,000 in genuine bills to be photographed for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Guy Robin EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Robert Lee HENSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger CRIST, Warden; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. ToroU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. Sager v. MaassDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1995
  5. United States v. Francisco Oscar Dessens-Fimbres, United States of America v. Oscar Alfredo Liera, United States of America v. Raul Martinez, United States of America v. Rafael Jose Rivera-CoronadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API