Falco v. Kaltenbach
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Per Ctjriam.
The stipulated facts are that relators are the owners of land in the city of Elizabeth, fronting thirty-four feet on Monroe avenue and one hundred and fifteen feet in depth along Louisa street, on which there has been for three years a frame dwelling, two and one-half stories high, with two stores facing Monroe avenue and one facing Louisa street.
Relators acquired said property August 31st, 1921, and there are no restrictive covenants in anywise affecting the use of said lands. That said lands are embraced In “Residence B” district of the zoning ordinance of Elizabeth. Since the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cooney v. RushmoreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Howden v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Dorsey Motors, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935