Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Richards v. D. R. Horton, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 26, 2013No. A12A1814Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, Presiding Judge

I concur with the majority’s opinion to reverse the trial court’s dismissal of Richards’s claims against D. R. Horton, Inc., because he does in fact have standing to raise these claims. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Richards’s claims against the other defendants. While I agree with Judge McFadden that the trial court’s order should be reversed with respect to Richards’s claims against the additional defendants, I write separately because I would reverse on this point for a different reason and remand with instructions.

As…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. Wendy's International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Baillie Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. In Re UpshurUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
  4. In Re PhelpsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005
  5. Gingold v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API