Hawes v. Coombs
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Floyd Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.
Epaphias Hawes, William C. Coombs, and Andrew P. Jackson were partners in business. A difference arose about the settlement of their accounts. They entered into an agreement, as the writing says, “ to arbitrate the difference now existing between us in the following manner, *456•consisting of all our partnership business, comprising the manufacture of spirits, lumber, hominy, meal, pork, &c. We further agree to make this arbitration the rule of justice’s ■court,” &c. It then proceeds to name the persons who are to act as arbitrators, and to specify how, in some respects, the arbitration is to be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Titus v. ScantlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
- Estep v. LarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Coffin v. WoodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1840
- Hedrick v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bartlett v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith ex rel. Smith v. KirkpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1877