Legal Opinion

Hawes v. Coombs

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1870PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Floyd Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Epaphias Hawes, William C. Coombs, and Andrew P. Jackson were partners in business. A difference arose about the settlement of their accounts. They entered into an agreement, as the writing says, “ to arbitrate the difference now existing between us in the following manner, *456•consisting of all our partnership business, comprising the manufacture of spirits, lumber, hominy, meal, pork, &c. We further agree to make this arbitration the rule of justice’s ■court,” &c. It then proceeds to name the persons who are to act as arbitrators, and to specify how, in some respects, the arbitration is to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Titus v. ScantlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Estep v. LarshIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Coffin v. WoodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1840
  4. Hedrick v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Smith ex rel. Smith v. KirkpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API