Legal Opinion

Eastman v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

The appellant was indicted for feloniously receiving and aiding in the concealment “ of five watches, of the value of fifty-seven dollars, twenty watdh chains, of the value of twenty-five dollars, fourteen nut picks, of the value of-five dollars, eleven gold rings, of the *442value of fifty dollars, six penknives, of the value of four dollars,” well knowing that the same, before that time, had been stolen. He pleaded guilty to the indictment. The court, upon its own motion, but without objection from the appellant, empanelled a jury to assess the amount of punishment against the appellant. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGuire v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Mullen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Laydon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Bishop v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Bond v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ex Parte BustamenteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Dantz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Lott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1885
  5. Lash v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API