Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lash v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1981No. 2-579A143Published

1DissentBuchanan, Chief Judge

The sanctity of Elmore v. State, (1978) Ind., 382 N.E.2d 893 and McKinley v. State, (1980) Ind., 400 N.E.2d 1378, has been violated. One who knowingly robs a person of business property and personal property at the same time commits two robbery offenses.

Elmore is the landmark case setting the standard as to what constitutes separate offenses. The focus is on “[w]hether or not the offenses to be prosecuted and punished are the same, and not whether the offenses spring from the same act or operative circumstances.” Elmore v. State, at 897. Each conviction of a separate offense of robbery…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hatcher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Furnace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API