Legal Opinion

(PC) Walker v. King

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 10, 2020No. 1:16-cv-01665Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROGER WALKER, Case No. 1:16-cv-01665-AWI-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS 12 v. DAVIS, NICKS, PERRYMAN, AND POOLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE 13 TIM POOLE, et al., GRANTED AND THAT DEFENDANT SALOUM’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 Defendants. JUGDMENT BE DENIED 15 (ECF Nos. 111 & 112) 16 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 17 TWENTY-ONE DAYS 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 Roger Walker (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 21 in this civil rights…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API