Legal Opinion

United States v. David Gelbard, United States of America v. Sidney Parnas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1971No. 71-1263_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

These consolidated appeals involve persons who proved recalcitrant when they appeared as witnesses before a federal grand jury and who were each committed to custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826(a), after being adjudged guilty of civil contempt. In order to meet the rigorous statutory time limit imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 1826(b) it was necessary to, and this court did, immediately following oral argument, render decision. We affirmed the judgment of the court below and stated an opinion would follow. This is that opinion.

Both Gelbard, the appellant in No. 71-1263, and Parnas, the appellant in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Larry Carter, Steve Shead, and Fred Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Mark Lawrence AlterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. In the Matter of Alphonse PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. LanzaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1972
  5. United States v. Karen DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API