Legal Opinion

Rambus Inc. v. Infineon Technologies Ag

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 4, 2003No. 02-1192Published

1Opinion of the Court

318 F.3d 1081

RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., and Infineon Technologies Holding North America Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants.

No. 01-1449.

No. 01-1583.

No. 01-1604.

No. 01-1641.

No. 02-1174.

No. 02-1192.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: January 29, 2003.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied: April 4, 2003.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard G. Taranto, Farr & Taranto, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were William K. West, Jr., Cecilia H. Gonzalez, Joseph P.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API