Barksdale v. Van's Auto Sales, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hans R. Veit, Judge.
This matter was initially before this court on January 26, 1987, at which time we affirmed the Cleveland Municipal Court’s ruling. We held that we could not consider the merits of the appeal because the notice of appeal mistakenly specified that the appeal was taken from the order denying the motion for a new trial rather than from the final judgment on the merits. The Supreme Court in Barksdale v. Van’s Auto Sales, Inc. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 127, 527 N.E.2d 284, reversed our judgment and held that any mistake in appealing from an order denying a motion for new trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barksdale v. Van's Auto Sales, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Pinkerson v. PinkersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Maritime Manufacturers, Inc. v. Hi-Skipper MarinaOhio Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by14 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. Huls America, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Bobb Forest Products, Inc. v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Abele v. Bayliner Marine Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Chiles Power Supply, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Keel v. Toledo Harley-Davidson/BuellOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.