Flannagin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
Murder, first degree: sentence, electrocution.
I
We have examined the applicability of Boulden v. Holman, 394 U.S. 478, 89 S.Ct. 1138, 22 L.Ed.2d 433, and conclude that the five veniremen challenged by the State exhibited an irrevocable commitment to vote against capital punishment. There is no error in the ruling below.
II
Over objection the victim’s pocketknife and bloody shirt were allowed in evidence.
On appeal error is claimed because of irrelevance. If the victim was wearing the shirt when Flannagin shot him, there, in all probability, would have been a hole in the shirt.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wright v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Grissett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Schmitt v. PierceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Harnage v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Shields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.