Legal Opinion

State v. Boehmer

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1980No. 7049, 7359PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,.

This is an appeal from the judgments entered in separate trials by the district court finding Defendants Ronald Boehmer and Sau Gogo guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of HRS § 29-4. Since both cases involve the same question of law, they have been consolidated for argument on appeal.

In each case, the defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor and, after arrest, given a breathalyzer test.

As to Defendant Boehmer, the test reading showed 0.11% by weight of alcohol in his blood, and as to Defendant Gogo, 0.10%…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CuevasHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. BjornsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. RackleHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BurlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Motor Vehicle Administration v. LytleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Barcott v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. DowHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API