State v. Boehmer
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,.
This is an appeal from the judgments entered in separate trials by the district court finding Defendants Ronald Boehmer and Sau Gogo guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of HRS § 29-4. Since both cases involve the same question of law, they have been consolidated for argument on appeal.
In each case, the defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor and, after arrest, given a breathalyzer test.
As to Defendant Boehmer, the test reading showed 0.11% by weight of alcohol in his blood, and as to Defendant Gogo, 0.10%…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. CuevasHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BjornsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. RackleHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. BurlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. LytleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Barcott v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. DowHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.