Legal Opinion
Isom v. Muhammad
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 9, 2018No. CASE NO. 4:17–CV–00703–JMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge
Pending is Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the counterclaim filed by Defendants. The *845motion is fully briefed and ripe for determination. For the reasons stated below, the motion to dismiss (Document No. 8) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff worked for Defendants at their retail store in Conway, Arkansas. Her duties included conducing retail transactions and overseeing some of the day-to-day operations of the store. Her complaint alleges that Defendant willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. (FLSA) and the Arkansas Minimum Wage…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- ABF Freight System, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stafford v. The Bath Planet of Arkansas, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2020