Legal Opinion

Cottman v. Dunbar Armored, Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 6, 2020No. 2:19-cv-05450Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LATISHA COTTMAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:19-cv-5450 v. Judge Michael H. Watson Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers DUNBAR ARMORED, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER AND INITIAL SCREEN REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff LaTisha Cottman, an Ohio resident proceeding without the assistance of counsel, has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis with this action. (ECF No. 1.) The motion is GRANTED. All judicial officers who render services in this action shall do so as if the costs had been prepaid. 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API