Legal Opinion

Baldwin Contracting Co. v. Winston Steel Works, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1965No. Civ. 21933PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Defendants, Winston Steel Works, Inc. (hereafter referred to as Winston), and Sacramento Erectors, Inc. (hereafter referred to as Sacramento), construction subcontractors, appeal from a judgment entered on a directed verdict, holding that they are obligated to indemnify the general contractor, plaintiff, Baldwin Construction Company (hereafter referred to as Baldwin), and from the orders denying their motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Winston appeals from the order denying its motion for a nonsuit. The main questions presented are whether Baldwin was affirmatively negligent,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ault v. International Harvester Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Markley v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Douglas Aircraft Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API