Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. McLaughlin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 24, 1939No. 31,972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $3,000 in this action for malpractice, and defendants appeal from the order denying their motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The record shows without dispute that plaintiff, 68 years of age, a resident of Wabasha, afflicted with an incipient cataract of her right eye, came to be treated therefor to the clinic of defendants Dr. McLaughlin and Dr. Nauth at Winona, this state. She was accompanied by a friend, Mrs. Carver, 78 years old, who also sought treatment for her eyes, when, on September 9, 1937,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Semerjian v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Moehlenbrock v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Nelson v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Quickstad v. TavennerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ericksen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API