Legal Opinion

United States v. Ratagczak

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 15, 1921No. 6756PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On Information. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Steve Ratagczak. On demurrer to plea in bar.

1Opinion of the Court

WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

Defendant is by information charged under the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305) with the offense of having on or about the 11th day of May, 1921, had unlawfully in his possession 92 quarts of Gibson whisky. To this information the defendant has filed a special piea of former acquittal, to which the plaintiff has demurred generally. The allegations as to the identity of the defendant and of the transactions are sufficient to make a good plea in bar, but the former judgment of acquittal thus pleaded, it is alleged, was rendered by the criminal branch of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Fox v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  5. National Prohibition CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. McCainDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. States v. McCannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API