Legal Opinion

City of Greensburg v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1899No. 3,098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erom the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, J. —

Appellant sued appellee before the mayor of a city, and in that court recovered a judgment of $10 in the nature of a penalty for violation of a city ordinance regulating the speed of trains. Appellee appealed to the circuit court, and a trial resulted in a judgment in appellant’s favor for $1. Upon motion of appellee, costs were taxed against appellant, and this action of the court is the only error assigned.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the action originated before the mayor of a city and the amount in controversy was less than $50, exclusive of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. City of Hammond v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Ridge v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Clinton Township v. De HavenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wirgau v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Biedinger v. City of East ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Colliery Engineer Co. v. American Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Jerzakowski v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Mantle Lamp Co. v. BonichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API