Taksir v. Vanguard Group, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rufe, J.
Defendant The Vanguard Group, Inc', has moved for reconsideration of the Court’s May 26, 2017 Opinion denying Vanguard’s motion to dismiss the complaint. In the alternative, Vanguard seeks leave to file an interlocutory appeal. Finding no error in its earlier decision, the Court will deny Vanguard’s motion for reconsideration, but because this case raises important and unsettled issues of preclusion under the federal securities laws, the Court will certify its decision for immediate appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
I. INTRODUCTION
■ Plaintiffs, on behalf of a proposed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BROWN v. FRIELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Stephen Walden, Leslie Walden v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, BNY Mellon, N.A.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026