Legal Opinion

Singer v. Shaughnessy

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided March 30, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 3632PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLEY, District Judge.

This complex action is based upon claims for refund of substantial federal estate taxes paid under proper protest to the defendant commissioner. It was tried be*507fore this Court and a jury, and in order to simplify the various factual problems created by the evidence and to assist the jury to intelligently separate and decide the issues, nine questions in writing were submitted, requiring categorical answers. This procedure was in accordance with Rule 49(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and this method, at the suggestion of the Court, was agreed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruddy v. New York Central Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1954
  2. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API