Walker v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I agree wholeheartedly with the majority’s treatment of the procedural question relating to determining the voluntariness of an accused’s statement, but I would affirm this conviction. The statement of the judge is so nearly correct, that I have reservations about its being properly classified as a comment on the evidence. The circuit judge clearly recognized that the jury must determine whether the statement admitted in evidence was actually made by the defendant and its “truthfulness.” In my view, this properly left for jury determination three questions, namely: (1) whether Walker made the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Back v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Petty v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Parrott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.