Legal Opinion
People v. Kemp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his guilty plea was not voluntary, knowing and intelligent (see generally, People v Moore, 147 AD2d 745; see also, People v Davis, 161 AD2d 787, lv denied 76 NY2d 939). We likewise reject the contention of defendant that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Because defendant did not assert in County Court that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial, he has failed to preserve that contention for our review (see, People v Moss, 188 AD2d 620, 620-621, lv denied 81 NY2d 890; People v Larry,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. LarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SpikesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. ChinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- CHINN, SAM, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. ChinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. KempAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.