Legal Opinion
People v. Madrigal
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1995No. B085069PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
Defendant and appellant Manuel Ranjel Madrigal appeals from a judgment following revocation of his probation. We conclude the trial judge acted in excess of his jurisdiction when he revoked defendant’s probation, after defendant’s probation violation matter had been duly assigned to another judge in accordance with local court rules. We reverse.
Facts and Procedural Background
On August 3, 1993, defendant was charged by information in the instant case, No. TA025194, with receiving stolen property in violation of Penal Code section 496. On August 20, 1993, defendant pleaded no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Shane v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. BeaudrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Silverman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Vanterpool v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- In Re AlbertoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Wozniak v. LUCUTZCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. GOODWILLIECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.