Strickland v. Alexander
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARVIN H. SHOOB, Senior District Judge.
This action challenging the constitutionality of Georgia’s post-judgment garnishment statute, O.C.G.A. § 18-4-60 et seq., is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For. the following reasons, the Court denies defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 90], grants plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [Doc. 93], and enters appropriate declaratory and injunctive relief.
Statement of Facts1
Plaintiff Tony W. Strickland had a long career installing gas products until he was diagnosed with cancer in 2004. Mr. Strickland…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- RES-GA Diamond Meadows, LLC v. Robertson (In re Robertson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Tidewater Finance Co. (In re Cole)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Strickland v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Modi v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
- dept labor v. greeneVermont Superior Court · 2024