Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Alexander

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided September 8, 2015No. Civil Action No. 1:12-CV-02735-MHSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARVIN H. SHOOB, Senior District Judge.

This action challenging the constitutionality of Georgia’s post-judgment garnishment statute, O.C.G.A. § 18-4-60 et seq., is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For. the following reasons, the Court denies defendant’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 90], grants plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [Doc. 93], and enters appropriate declaratory and injunctive relief.

Statement of Facts1

Plaintiff Tony W. Strickland had a long career installing gas products until he was diagnosed with cancer in 2004. Mr. Strickland…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. RES-GA Diamond Meadows, LLC v. Robertson (In re Robertson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
  2. Southwest Airlines Co. v. Tidewater Finance Co. (In re Cole)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  3. Strickland v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  4. Modi v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
  5. dept labor v. greeneVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API