Legal Opinion

Pitts v. City of New Orleans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1969No. 3645PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REGAN, Judge.

The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. James Pitts, filed this suit against the defendant, the City of New Orleans, endeavoring to recover the sum of $5,172.50, representing damages for personal injuries and medical expenses which they assert were incurred as the result of the negligence of the defendant in failing to properly inspect and repair steps servicing a passenger bridge, the collapse of which caused Mrs. Pitts to sustain the injuries which form the subject of this litigation.

The defendant answered and denied the foregoing accusations of negligence and in the alternative, it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brantley v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Hebert v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Smith v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Carsey v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Howard v. Great American Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API