Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 18, 2018No. Criminal No. 10-0133 (PLF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

The matter is before the Court on the motion [Dkt. No. 128] of defendant Floyd Clark to admit hearsay in support of his separate motion to vacate, set aside, or *192correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The United States opposes the motion. Upon careful consideration of the parties' papers, the relevant legal authorities, the evidentiary hearing on June 20, 2016, and the entire record in this case, the Court will grant Mr. Clark's motion to admit hearsay.1

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History

On May 6, 2009, two men carjacked, robbed, and kidnapped…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. BaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Nicholas SlattenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Lawrence KearneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API