Green v. Holz

Defendant 1 appeals from a judgment 2 following a trial to the court. He assigns error to the court’s findings and to the award of attorney fees to plaintiffs. We affirm.

This case arises out of plaintiffs’ purchase of a dry cleaning business from defendant Holz. Defendant was the Holzes’ accountant for the dry cleaning business. Plaintiffs brought claims against defendant and the Holzes for the fraudulent sale of securities, common law fraud, violation of ORS 60.774 (the right of a shareholder to inspect the records of a corporation), and breach of warranty. The Holzes settled with plaintiffs…