Legal Opinion
UMC Electronics Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 2, 1985No. 335-80CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), the plaintiff brought this action to recover reasonable and entire compensation for infringement of its patent by the United States. The defendant argues that it has not infringed the patent and that the patent is invalid. During a four-day trial the parties presented evidence and testimony to a judge of this court, who retired without having made findings of fact or conclusions of law. The parties have waived a new trial and have submitted post-trial briefs. After hearing oral argument on those briefs and considering the entire record,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Umc Electronics Company v. The United States, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Umc Electronics Company v. The United States, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987