Legal Opinion

Addison Gilbert Hospital v. Rate Setting Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 23, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The plaintiffs, twenty-six nonprofit hospitals located throughout the Commonwealth, brought this action to challenge the validity of a regulation promulgated by the Rate Setting Commission. 114.1 Code Mass. Regs. § 3.06 (1981). The contested regulation establishes a fixed reimbursement rate for each “administratively necessary day,” see note 6, infra, spent by a Medicaid patient in a hospital in the Commonwealth. A Superior Court judge entered partial summary judgment for the hospitals on the issue of liability. The judge concluded that the regulation was invalid from February 1, 1981, its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Moe v. Secretary of Administration & FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Perkins School for the Blind v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Massachusetts General Hospital v. Stephen M. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quincy City Hospital v. RATE SETTING COMMISSIONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. New England Memorial Hospital v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Addison Gilbert Hospital v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Falmouth Hospital v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Geriatric Authority v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API