Legal Opinion

United States v. Dana Rudolph Peep

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1974No. 73-1293PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, Circuit Judge.

Dana Rudolph Peep was convicted of unlawful possession of heroin and hashish in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a). In this appeal, he challenges the war-rantless search of his person which produced the evidence of his guilt. 1

On August 25, 1972, law enforcement officers assigned to the Federal Drug Abuse Enforcement Program obtained a warrant to search the premises at 3445 Second Avenue, South, in Minneapolis. The warrant authorized a search of the premises and the persons of one “Larry Conley” and one “John L/N/U” for “narcotic drugs and controlled substances possessed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Eric B. Reinholz Margaret E. ChevalierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Michael John McGlynn and Kevin John SchantzenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Donald Edward ClayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Katherine BuckhanonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API