People v. Succop
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
Donald Markell Succop appeals from an order of commitment adjudging him to be a probable mentally disordered sex offender1 and directing that he be confined in a state hospital for observation and diagnosis for a period not to exceed 90 days.
*485Succop, who represented himself at the trial, was found guilty by a jury of indecent exposure (Pen. Code, § 314, subd. 1). He admitted two prior convictions of the same offense. The court was of the view that he might be a mentally disordered sex offender and appointed two psychiatrists to examine him and ordered a probation report.
Subsequently the court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. KeenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. Gary W.California Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. SuccopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.