In re the Arbitration between Goodman & Lazrus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*531The contract provides for arbitration pursuant to the Laws of the State of New York of “ any dispute arising out of this agreement.” The issues raised in the second and third defenses relating to oral cancellation of the agreement, waiver of written notice thereof, abandonment, suspension and estoppel, raise no question as to the making of the agreement (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1450). Consequently, these issues lie exclusively within the jurisdiction of the arbitrators pursuant to the contractual provision (Matter of Lipman [Haeuser Shellac Co.], 289 N. Y. 76, 80; Matter of Minkin [Halperin], 279…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glickenhaus & Co. v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990