Legal Opinion

Robert Whitfield v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 6, 2013No. 01-12-00081-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL MASSENGALE, Justice.

Appellant Robert Whitfield has filed an appeal solely challenging the trial court’s finding under article 64.04 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure that it was not reasonably probable that he would not have been convicted if the results of DNA testing had been available during his trial. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.04 (West Supp.2012). He contends that there was insufficient evidence supporting the trial court’s finding. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The Court of Criminal Appeals held in State v. Holloway, 360 S.W.3d 480…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. State v. HollowayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Ex Parte RuizCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Roy Dale Glover v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  3. Harrison, LeonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API