Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of D.D.R.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 2006No. A05-658, A05-752Published
1Opinion of the Court
713 N.W.2d 891 (2006)
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF D.D.R.
Nos. A05-658, A05-752.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
May 16, 2006.
Leonardo Castro, Chief Fourth District Public Defender, Barbara S. Isaacman, Assistant Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant D.D.R.
Michael Hatch, State Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Amy Klobuchar, Hennepin County Attorney, Linda K. Jenny, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, MN for respondent State of Minnesota.
Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and RANDALL, Judge.
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
D.D.R. was charged with first- and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- United States v. Reginald Pierre Beasley, United States of America v. Oliver Lawrence BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.