Legal Opinion

Kentucky Lead & Oil Co. v. New Albany Water-Works

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This action was commenced in the Floyd Circuit Court hy Conger & Howard, against the Yew *64Albany Water-Works, the Kentucky Lead and Oil Company, the Ludlow Valve Company, Richard Wood & Co., DeWitt C. Hill and Michael Zier, partners, Ered. D. Conner, assignee of Hill & Zier, in bankruptcy, and other defendants who need not be named.

The object of the suit was to enforce a mechanic’s lien held by Conger & Howard on two buildings constructed by them, situated on two separate and distinct lots of land, in Eloyd county, owned by the New Albany WaterWorks.

The original plaintiffs, Conger & Howard,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dudley v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Weber v. WeatherbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. Donahue v. CromartieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eufaula Water Co. v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Oxford Iron Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API