Legal Opinion

Black, Exrs. v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1933No. Appeal, 89PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

April 10, 1933:

This appeal is a sequence of our decision in Black et al., Exrs., v. Hoffman et al., 309 Pa. 423, 164 A. 518.

That appeal was from a decree taken pro confesso on a bill of discovery to produce for inspection a document, the integrity of which had been challenged by persons whose property interests would be prejudiced by that document’s existence. The litigation instituted by the present appellants with the alleged-to-exist document as its foundation, is reviewed in our opinion in Cross’s Est., 309 Pa. 418, 164 A. 516.

When we affirmed the decree in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cross's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Black, Exrs. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blue Ridge Metal Manufacturing Co. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Hoffman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Hick v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Black v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API