Legal Opinion

Mulder v. Achterhof

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 36,195PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In this suit plaintiff seeks to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by her in consequence of injuries received by her minor son in an automobile accident for which she charges defendants are responsible. The facts and circumstances surrounding the accident appear in Essenberg v. Achterhof, 255 Mich. 55. Prior to the accident the father of the minor had died. The mother here seeks to recover expenses incurred by her incident to her minor son’s injuries and also the loss of his earnings during his minority which the mother has or will sustain. Plaintiff had judgment for $2,100; and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Black v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Pratt v. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Essenberg v. AchterhofMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Texas & Pacific R'y Co. v. MorinTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De Korse v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  2. De Korse v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API