Legal Opinion

Essenberg v. Achterhof

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1931No. Docket No. 67, Calendar No. 35,273PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries received in collision with an automobile owned by defendants and operated by Harry Achterhof. The plaintiff and four other boys were riding bicycles on Twenty-ninth street, a dirt road in the outskirts of the city of Holland, Ottawa county, Michigan. Twenty-ninth street is a side street. • It connects with Michigan avenue, a main thoroughfare, but does not cross it. When it reaches Michigan avenue, it divides and branches off to the north and to the south. The plaintiff and his companions rode onto the north branch. He says that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Kelley v. KellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Leary v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Dreyfus v. DaroncoMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dier v. VoorheesMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oxenger v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Suarez v. KatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Fitzpatrick v. RitzenheinMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Triestram v. WayMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Brown v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API