Legal Opinion
State v. Tenbrook
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
Decided November 2, 1987No. Nos. CR-220414 and -220051PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames J. McMonagle, J.
The defendant has requested this court for an order permitting inspection and examination of the grand jury transcripts of the proceedings that resulted in his indictment in each of the above-captioned cases. The prosecutor has objected and has asked this court to uphold the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings and further claims that the defense is merely conducting an unwarranted search for discovery purposes.
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rule 31,1 requiring a record of grand jury proceedings, was *15implemented on September 8, 1987. Case No. CR-220414 was presented before that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wurth v. Emro Marketing CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re Invenstigation into the November 22, 2014 Shooting Death of Tamir RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. ElamClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2004
- State v. GillispieOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. SuskindOhio Court of Appeals · 1992