Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1967PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

If a defendant has made use of any false or fraudulent representation or pretense in the course of .accomplishing, or in aid of, or in facilitating a theft, evidence thereof may not be received at the trial, unless the indictment dr information charges . such, representation or pretense (Penal Law, § 1290-a). This statute (L. 1950, ch. 149) enacted the principles expressed in the dissenting opinion by Judge Fuld in People v. Lobel (298 N. Y. 243): Appellant contends that evidence of this character was illegally introduced against him in this prosecution for grand larceny in the first degree.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. LobelNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Percy Rutherford v. John T. Deegan, Warden of Sing Sing PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. People v. CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. People v. KampshoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API