People v. Brown
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
If a defendant has made use of any false or fraudulent representation or pretense in the course of .accomplishing, or in aid of, or in facilitating a theft, evidence thereof may not be received at the trial, unless the indictment dr information charges . such, representation or pretense (Penal Law, § 1290-a). This statute (L. 1950, ch. 149) enacted the principles expressed in the dissenting opinion by Judge Fuld in People v. Lobel (298 N. Y. 243): Appellant contends that evidence of this character was illegally introduced against him in this prosecution for grand larceny in the first degree.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. LobelNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- United States of America Ex Rel. Percy Rutherford v. John T. Deegan, Warden of Sing Sing PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- People v. CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- People v. KampshoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.