Legal Opinion

United States v. Glanat Realty Corp. And Eastern Suffolk Concerte and Asphalt Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 15, 1960No. 144, Docket 25804PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, Circuit Judge.

These appeals are to review awards of compensation for the condemnation of easements above real property owned by two corporations in Suffolk County, New York. We shall speak of the Eastern Suffolk Concrete and Asphalt Corp. as “Eastern Suffolk” and the Glanat Realty Corp. as “Glanat.” The only issue on the appeal is whether the awards, made by Inch, J., after a trial without a jury, were too small. That made to “Eastern Suffolk” was $8,572; that made to “Glanat” was $3,778, both with interest.

When the Air Force Base in Suffolk County was originally constructed in 1942, it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. 429.59 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. Shelly Materials, Inc v. Streetsboro Planning & Zoning Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. United States v. 158.76 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in the Town of Townshend, Windham County, State of Vermont, and Janet Hoadley JacquesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API