Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Harvey Austin Jr.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 19, 2016No. Docket Som-14-374Published

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] Harvey Austin Jr. appeals from a judgment of conviction of abuse of property for failing to label an observation stand (Class E), 12 M.R.S. §. 10652(1)(B)(2) (2014), entered in the trial court (Somerset County, Mullen, J.) following a bench trial. Austin contends that when he purchased his hunting license he was given a magazine summarizing Maine hunting laws and rules, endorsed by the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (IF&W), that misstated the law concerning tree stands, and for that reason the State was equitably estopped from prosecuting him. 1 We affirm the judgment.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. State v. FoxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. State of Maine v. Dan BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. State of Maine v. Stanley FletcherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  5. Raynes v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API